1 Pares Land Walk
Rochdale OL16 5SX
4 June 2007
The Clerk to the Justices
Rochdale, Middleton & Heywood Magistrates Court
The Courthouse
Town Meadows
Rochdale OL16 1AR
Dear Sirs
R. v Thomas Moore
Rochdale, Middleton & Heywood Magistrates Court
24 May 2007 (two hearings)
I refer to the above, and my letters to you of 2 June 2007, 1 June 2007, 31 May 2007, 30 May 2007, 29 May 2007, 28 May 2007, 24 May 2007, 24 May 2007, 23 May 2007 and 30 March 2007 (copies attached). Please will you reply to my letters properly, as hitherto, as to the best of my knowledge, you have not?
Criminal Procedure Rules (CrPR)
My objective
I do not know a short form for the Criminal Procedure Rules, so I will use CrPR and CrPRs in this communication, as hitherto I have understood CPR to mean the Civil Procedure Rules. I would appreciate guidance, as the charges mixes Civil and Criminal law, and in this case it may well be necessary for the Prosecution (mainly) to invoke both Criminal and Civil rules, protocols and so on.
I have discovered some CrPRs that make demands and place obligations on me. I have no legal qualification of any kind, but am trying to do my best to help the Court. I am using ordinary English, restricted mainly by my Autism, with a few very limited legal terms I have learnt while facing over a decade of litigious harassment in the Civil Courts by Mr. Keith Exford.
My understanding could well be wrong. In the first Claim Keith Exford filed against me, I had to use a dictionary for "inter alia."
CrPR 1.2 (c)
"Each participant, in the conduct of each case, must at once inform all the parties of any significant failure, . . .."
I believe I may have failed to comply CrPR, and to the extent that I have, it was because I was ignorant of their content, and not aware that they place obligations on me.
The duty of the Court CrPR 3.2 (2)2
- Identification of the issues is yet to occur. Unless the Court can identify a clear case to answer, and sufficient evidence in support of that proposition, the Court must dismiss the prosecution.
-
- Unless the prosecution is dismissed, abandoned or otherwise brought to an end, I ask the Court to commit this prosecution for trial in the Crown Court. I invite the Crown to abandon this Prosecution, and I invite the Court to dismiss the prosecution. Otherwise, I wish to exercise, and I am exercising, my right to have this determined by the Crown Court upon indictment.
Duties of the Parties CrPR 3.33
(a)
"Each Party must actively assist the court in fulfilling its duty under rule 3.2, with or if necessary with a direction."
The documents handed to me on 30 March 2007 have no delimitation. At best this facilitates error, for if a document is lost the holder may not realise and believe it was never served. No responsibility is taken for the 30 March 2007 bundle.
- I ask the Prosecution to remedy these short comings, preferably with pagination and a letter headed cover sheet, mentioning at least the number of documents.
- The documents handed to me on 24 May 2007 have only a clip serving as delimitation. I ask the Prosecution to remedy that potential problem in the same way.
I am not familiar with all the documents, especially those in the extensive 24 May 2007 bundle.
The sixth from last document in the 24 May 2007 bundle is apparently the first page of a three page letter from me to City of London Police Detective Constable O’Loughlin-Whitby of 2 February 2007. The next page, apparently the second of my 2 February 2007 letter, is difficult or impossible to read. The third page of that letter is missing.
- Would the Crown please furnish in an additional bundle, with a complete or at least clear copy of my 2 February 2007 letter, or explain that apparent failure to me in writing?
The second from last document in the 24 May 2007 bundle is apparently a copy of Usenet Post, dated 5 February 2005, and marked by hand "B36."
The last document in the 24 May 2007 bundle is apparently the final page of a copy of Usenet Post, headed “page 2 of 2," and marked by hand "B37."
- Would the Crown please disclose to me by letter if they consider this exhibit complete, and if they do not, would they please furnish a complete version in an additional bundle the complete document they believe they should have disclosed.
- The Crown told me the 24 May 2007 documents are a "courtesy bundle." I do not understand the term. Would the Crown please write to me with sufficient explanation of their term "courtesy bundle?"
- Should the Crown not agree to comply with the above requests within twenty-one days, or such other time as the Court believes fit, I ask that the Crown be directed to comply with the above requests.
(b)
"Each party must . . . apply for a direction if needed to further the overriding objective."
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council is further reducing my ability to present my case and fulfil my obligations to the Court.
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council has not restored my electricity supply properly.
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council wrote to me twice on 1 June 2007 proposing immediate civil litigation to repossess my home and giving me notice of a civil claim to demote my tenancy and effectively give the Housing Authority the right to evict me when it pleases.
Should I lose the facility to store and reproduce the papers I have detailing my dealings with the Complainant, Miss Sarah Branson, and/or my use of a word processor with which I am familiar, a fair trial will likely be impossible, subject to the precise nature of the allegation, should I ever understand it.
Rochdale Council’s allegations supporting its civil claims started with the same letter and allegations as Miss Sarah Branson. Rochdale Council dated its version of Miss Sarah Branson’s letter 21 February 2007 (exhibit 2), four weeks before I was charged with the allegation before this Court. Miss Branson’s letter is exhibit 1.
Showing you all Rochdale Council’s allegations would be prejudicial, unless perhaps I were rehearse my case, but that would have to be in public, and there is a close intersection between magistrates, and councillors, past and present. To do that, would assist my opponents in the civil courts.
Exhibit 3 is the Charge Sheet, which does confirm the close relation between the dates.
Rochdale Council’s 1 June 2007 Notice of Seeking Possession letter is exhibit 4, again with prejudicial comment clearly concealed.
One allegations in Rochdale Council’s 1 June 2007 Notice of Seeking Possession, which appears identical to one made by Miss Branson in this case, at least in its civil part, is exhibit 5.
Rochdale Council’s 1 June 2007 Notice of Seeking Demotion Order letter is exhibit 6, again with prejudicial comment clearly excluded.
One allegation in Rochdale Council’s 1 June 2007 Notice of Seeking Demotion Order, which appear identical to those made by Miss Branson in this case, at least in its civil part, is exhibit 7.
Yours faithfully
T Moore
Exhibit 1
Exhibit 2
Exhibit 3
Exhibit 4
Exhibit 6
Footnotes
Content start
Case management
| 3.1 | The scope of this Part |
| | This
Part applies to the management of each case in a magistrates' court and
in the Crown Court (including an appeal to the Crown Court) until the
conclusion of that case. |
| | Rules that apply to procedure in the Court of Appeal are in Parts 65 to 73 of these Rules. |
| 3.2 | The duty of the court |
| (1) | The court must further the overriding objective by actively managing the case. |
| (2) | Active case management includes – |
| (a) | the early identification of the real issues; |
| (b) | the early identification of the needs of witnesses; |
| (c) | achieving
certainty as to what must be done, by whom, and when, in particular by
the early setting of a timetable for the progress of the case; |
| (d) | monitoring the progress of the case and compliance with directions; |
| (e) | ensuring that evidence, whether disputed or not, is presented in the shortest and clearest way; |
| (f) | discouraging
delay, dealing with as many aspects of the case as possible on the same
occasion, and avoiding unnecessary hearings; |
| (g) | encouraging the participants to co-operate in the progression of the case; and |
| (h) | making use of technology. |
| (3) | The court must actively manage the case by giving any direction appropriate to the needs of that case as early as possible. |
| 3.3 | The duty of the parties |
| (a) | actively assist the court in fulfilling its duty under rule 3.2, without or if necessary with a direction; and |
| (b) | apply for a direction if needed to further the overriding objective. |
| 3.4 | Case progression officers and their duties |
| (1) | At the beginning of the case each party must, unless the court otherwise directs— |
| (a) | nominate an individual responsible for progressing that case; and |
| (b) | tell other parties and the court who he is and how to contact him. |
| (2) | In fulfilling its duty under rule 3.2, the court must where appropriate – |
| (a) | nominate a court officer responsible for progressing the case; and |
| (b) | make sure the parties know who he is and how to contact him. |
| (3) | In this Part a person nominated under this rule is called a case progression officer. |
| (4) | A case progression officer must – |
| (a) | monitor compliance with directions; |
| (b) | make sure that the court is kept informed of events that may affect the progress of that case; |
| (c) | make sure that he can be contacted promptly about the case during ordinary business hours; |
| (d) | act promptly and reasonably in response to communications about the case; and |
| (e) | if he will be unavailable, appoint a substitute to fulfil his duties and inform the other case progression officers. |
| 3.5 | The court's case management powers |
| (1) | In
fulfilling its duty under rule 3.2 the court may give any direction and
take any step actively to manage a case unless that direction or step
would be inconsistent with legislation, including these Rules. |
| (2) | In particular, the court may – |
| (a) | nominate a judge, magistrate, justices' clerk or assistant to a justices' clerk to manage the case; |
| (b) | give a direction on its own initiative or on application by a party; |
| (c) | ask or allow a party to propose a direction; |
| (d) | for
the purpose of giving directions, receive applications and
representations by letter, by telephone or by any other means of
electronic communication, and conduct a hearing by such means; |
| (e) | give a direction without a hearing; |
| (f) | fix, postpone, bring forward, extend or cancel a hearing; |
| (g) | shorten or extend (even after it has expired) a time limit fixed by a direction; |
| (h) | require that issues in the case should be determined separately, and decide in what order they will be determined; and |
| (i) | specify the consequences of failing to comply with a direction. |
| (3) | A magistrates' court may give a direction that will apply in the Crown Court if the case is to continue there. |
| (4) | The Crown Court may give a direction that will apply in a magistrates' court if the case is to continue there. |
| (5) | Any power to give a direction under this Part includes a power to vary or revoke that direction. |
| | Depending
upon the nature of a case and the stage that it has reached, its
progress may be affected by other Criminal Procedure Rules and by other
legislation. The note at the end of this Part lists other rules and
legislation that may apply. |
| 3.6 | Application to vary a direction |
| (1) | A party may apply to vary a direction if – |
| (a) | the court gave it without a hearing; |
| (b) | the court gave it at a hearing in his absence; or |
| (c) | circumstances have changed. |
| (2) | A party who applies to vary a direction must – |
| (a) | apply as soon as practicable after he becomes aware of the grounds for doing so; and |
| (b) | give as much notice to the other parties as the nature and urgency of his application permits. |
| 3.7 | Agreement to vary a time limit fixed by a direction |
| (1) | The parties may agree to vary a time limit fixed by a direction, but only if— |
| (a) | the variation will not – |
| | | (i) | affect the date of any hearing that has been fixed, or |
|
| | | (ii) | significantly affect the progress of the case in any other way; |
|
| (b) | the court has not prohibited variation by agreement; and |
| (c) | the court's case progression officer is promptly informed. |
| (2) | The
court's case progression officer must refer the agreement to the court
if he doubts the condition in paragraph (1)(a) is satisfied. |
| 3.8 | Case preparation and progression |
| (1) | At
every hearing, if a case cannot be concluded there and then the court
must give directions so that it can be concluded at the next hearing or
as soon as possible after that. |
| (2) | At every hearing the court must, where relevant – |
| (a) | if the defendant is absent, decide whether to proceed nonetheless; |
| (b) | take
the defendant's plea (unless already done) or if no plea can be taken
then find out whether the defendant is likely to plead guilty or not
guilty; |
| (c) | set,
follow or revise a timetable for the progress of the case, which may
include a timetable for any hearing including the trial or (in the
Crown Court) the appeal; |
| (d) | in
giving directions, ensure continuity in relation to the court and to
the parties’ representatives where that is appropriate and practicable;
and |
| (e) | where a direction has not been complied with, find out why, identify who was responsible, and take appropriate action. |
| 3.9 | Readiness for trial or appeal |
| (1) | This
rule applies to a party's preparation for trial or (in the Crown Court)
appeal, and in this rule and rule 3.10 trial includes any hearing at
which evidence will be introduced. |
| (2) | In fulfilling his duty under rule 3.3, each party must – |
| (a) | comply with directions given by the court; |
| (b) | take every reasonable step to make sure his witnesses will attend when they are needed; |
| (c) | make appropriate arrangements to present any written or other material; and |
| (d) | promptly inform the court and the other parties of anything that may – |
| | | (i) | affect the date or duration of the trial or appeal, or |
|
| | | (ii) | significantly affect the progress of the case in any other way. |
|
| (3) | The court may require a party to give a certificate of readiness. |
| 3.10 | Conduct of a trial or an appeal |
| | In order to manage the trial or (in the Crown Court) appeal, the court may require a party to identify – |
| (a) | which witnesses he intends to give oral evidence; |
| (b) | the order in which he intends those witnesses to give their evidence; |
| (c) | whether he requires an order compelling the attendance of a witness; |
| (d) | what arrangements, if any, he proposes to facilitate the giving of evidence by a witness; |
| (e) | what arrangements, if any, he proposes to facilitate the participation of any other person, including the defendant; |
| (f) | what written evidence he intends to introduce; |
| (g) | what other material, if any, he intends to make available to the court in the presentation of the case; |
| (h) | whether he intends to raise any point of law that could affect the conduct of the trial or appeal; and |
| (i) | what timetable he proposes and expects to follow. |
| 3.11 | Case management forms and records |
| (1) | The
case management forms set out in the Practice Direction must be used,
and where there is no form then no specific formality is required. |
| (2) | The court must make available to the parties a record of directions given. |
| | Case management may be affected by the following other rules and legislation: |
| | Parts 10.4 and 27.2: reminders of right to object to written evidence being read at trial |
| | Part 12.2: time for first appearance of accused sent for trial |
| | Part 13: dismissal of charges sent or transferred to the Crown Court |
| | Part 15: preparatory hearings in serious fraud and other complex or lengthy cases |
| | Parts 21 – 26: the rules that deal with disclosure |
| | Parts 27 – 36: the rules that deal with evidence |
| | Part 38: trial of children and young persons |
| | Part 39: trial on indictment |
| | Prosecution of Offences (Custody Time Limits) Regulations 1987((1)) |
| | Criminal Justice Act 1987 (Notice of Transfer) Regulations 1988((2)) |
| | Criminal Justice Act 1991 (Notice of Transfer) Regulations 1992((3)) |
| | Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (Defence Disclosure Time Limits) |
| | Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (Service of Prosecution Evidence) Regulations 2005((5)) |
| | Provisions of Acts of Parliament |
| | Sections 5, 10 and 18, Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980((6)): powers to adjourn hearings |
| | Sections 128 and 129, Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980((7)): remand in custody by magistrates’ courts |
| | Part 1, Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996(8)): disclosure |
| | Schedule 2, Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 ((9)): use of witness statements at trial |
| | Section 2, Administration of Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1933((10)): procedural conditions for trial in the Crown Court |
| | Section 6, Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980((11)): committal for trial |
| | Section 4, Criminal Justice Act 1987((12)); section 53, Criminal Justice Act 1991((13)); section 51 and (so far as it is in force) section 51A, Crime and Disorder Act 1998((14)): other procedures by which a case reaches the Crown Court |
| | Section 7, Criminal Justice Act 1987((15)); Parts III and IV, Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996: pre-trial and preparatory hearings in the Crown Court |
| | Section 9, Criminal Justice Act 1967((16)): proof by written witness statement |
|
Content end